4/30/2023 0 Comments Metes and bounds vs long lotsSeveral directors who have committed to supporting e-journal archiving do so because they have experienced loss. Digital preservation is a “just-in-case scenario,” commented one director, “and this is very much a just-in-time operation.” Another noted, “Archiving is the last thing that gets taken care of because it’s the farthest thing out.” One director did assert that she would not want to gamble on what it would take to obtain access later if her institution did not invest now, likening that decision to not buying a book and waiting three years to see whether there was a demand for it. Some felt the sense of urgency as a vague concern rather than as an immediate crisis, and several were willing to defer action until a crisis point is reached. These directors were all aware of digital preservation as a major concern, but they differed on whether it was a priority for support and action. Three common themes emerged in the interviews: the sense of urgency, resource commitment and competing priorities, and the need for collective response. They also revealed some interesting opinions on the topic. The interviews helped refine the issues to be covered in our survey. Technical approach ( How do we judge whether the approach is rigorous enough to meet its archiving objectives?).Library responsibilities and resource requirements ( What will this cost our library in staff time, expertise, financial commitment? Would our support save the library money?).Program viability ( What evidence is there that these efforts are sufficiently well-governed and financed to last?).Access ( What will we gain access to? When and under what conditions?).Content coverage ( Are current approaches covering the subject areas, titles, and journal components in which we are most interested?).Library motivation ( Why should we be concerned about or invest in this?).In preparing this report, our team focused on the following: Not included are preservation efforts covering digitized versions of print journals, such as JSTOR library-led digital conversion projects self-archiving efforts by publishers and initiatives still being planned. This study focuses on the “who, what, when, where, why, and how” of significant archiving programs operated by not-for-profit organizations in the domain of peer-reviewed journal literature published in digital form. Despite this, we describe in this report the current lay of the land for scholarly e-journal archiving. These factors, along with our need to rely heavily on self-reporting by the programs, mean that direct comparisons between them may not always be valid. Definitions and terms are widely interpreted, and standards are not yet established. The e-publishing terrain is changing at time-lapse photography speed. In undertaking our survey of the e-journal archiving landscape, we found that precise measurements and controlled data collection were not always possible. However, the metes and bounds system is still used when it is impossible or impractical to make more precise measurements. More accurate means of measuring were established to overcome the method’s serious shortcomings: streambeds move over time, witness trees are struck by lightning, compass needles do not point true north, and measuring chains and surveyor strides can be of slightly differing lengths. states were laid out by metes and bounds. This was accepted practice before more precise instruments and methods were developed-indeed, the original 13 U.S. A survey “by metes and bounds” is a highly descriptive delineation of a plot of land that relies on natural landmarks, such as trees, bodies of water, and large stones, and often-crude measurements of distance and direction.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |